Current:Home > reviewsIowa law allows police to arrest and deport migrants. Civil rights groups are suing -Prime Capital Blueprint
Iowa law allows police to arrest and deport migrants. Civil rights groups are suing
View
Date:2025-04-21 22:01:49
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — A new law in Iowa that makes it a crime to be in the state if previously denied admission to the U.S. conflicts with federal law and could lead to the deportation of people who are legally in the country, civil rights and immigrant rights groups argue in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday.
The suit marks the first legal action taken against Iowa in response to the law, though the U.S. Department of Justice warned the state’s top officials last week that the agency would sue unless they agreed not to enforce it.
The complaint filed in U.S. District Court alleges that the new statute steps on the federal government’s authority to enforce immigration law. The law is similar to a more expansive Texas statute that has been challenged by both the Justice Department and civil rights groups.
“This ugly law is deeply harmful to Iowa families and communities,” said Rita Bettis Austen, legal director of The American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa. “Iowa lawmakers knowingly targeted people who are protected by federal immigration laws and who are legally allowed to be here.”
Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird said Thursday that the state would not back down, and that the law existed because President Joe Biden hasn’t secured the southern border.
“Iowa’s law is not unique; it simply enforces immigration laws while Biden refuses to,” Bird said in a written statement. “Iowa stands ready to defend our immigration law that keeps Iowa communities safe.”
The ACLU of Iowa, national ACLU and the American Immigration Council filed the suit Thursday on behalf of the Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice and two individual Iowans.
The Iowa law has increased fear among immigrant communities in the state that enforcement would lead to racial and ethnic profiling, complicate interactions with police or dissuade community members from reporting crime. Activist and advocacy groups, including one named in the suit, have hosted gatherings to try to answer people’s questions and organized protests in response.
Texas was allowed to enforce the law for only a few confusing hours in March before it was put on hold by a federal appeals court’s three-judge panel. The panel heard arguments by both supporters and opponents in April, and will next issue a decision on the law’s constitutionality.
Some law enforcement officials and legal experts have said unanswered questions remain about how the laws in Iowa and Texas would be implemented, since enforcement of immigration law has historically fallen to the federal government and is a binational process.
The Iowa law, which goes into effect on July 1, would allow criminal charges to be brought against people who have outstanding deportation orders or who previously have been removed from or denied admission to the U.S. Once in custody, migrants could either agree to a judge’s order to leave the U.S. or be prosecuted, potentially facing time in prison before deportation.
The Iowa lawsuit contends that the law conflicts with federal law and could direct police to arrest people who are authorized to be in the U.S., such as people who have been granted asylum or have visas. The suit said the law could result in the prosecution of children brought to Iowa by their parents.
“It will create absolute chaos and human suffering in our legal system, and harm Iowa communities,” said Melloy Goettel, legal director at the American Immigration Council.
Gov. Kim Reynolds, a Republican who signed the new legislation into law, reiterated her support for the change.
“As Governor, I have a responsibility to protect the citizens of Iowa,” Reynolds said in a written statement that repeated the arguments of other Republican leaders. “Since President Biden refuses to enforce our nation’s immigration laws — threatening the safety of our citizens — Iowa will step in.”
veryGood! (63653)
Related
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Transcript: Sen. Mark Kelly on Face the Nation, April 16, 2023
- Oscars 2023 Red Carpet Fashion: See Every Look as the Stars Arrive
- A Crypto-Trading Hamster Performs Better Than Warren Buffett And The S&P 500
- 'Most Whopper
- Hackers sent spam emails from FBI accounts, agency confirms
- Here's How Chris Rock Celebrated the 2023 Oscars Far Away From Hollywood
- Ex-Facebook employee says company has known about disinformation problem for years
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Canadians Are Released After A Chinese Executive Resolves U.S. Criminal Charges
Ranking
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Lawmakers Push Facebook To Abandon Instagram For Kids, Citing Mental Health Concerns
- Emily Blunt's White Hot Oscars 2023 Entrance Is Anything But Quiet
- 'Concerned Citizen' At Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes' Trial Turns Out To Be Family
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Nicole Kidman's All-Black Oscars 2023 Look Just May Be Our Undoing
- 'Concerned Citizen' At Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes' Trial Turns Out To Be Family
- NASA's Got A New, Big Telescope. It Could Find Hints Of Life On Far-Flung Planets
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Samsung says it will build $17B chip factory in Texas
Facebook wants to lean into the metaverse. Here's what it is and how it will work
Lyft And Uber Will Pay Drivers' Legal Fees If They're Sued Under Texas Abortion Law
Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
Lady Gaga Just Took Our Breath Away on the Oscars 2023 Red Carpet
3 Former U.S. Intelligence Operatives Admit Hacking For United Arab Emirates
Facebook will examine whether it treats Black users differently